‘Hyper-partisanship’ on CBDCs hinders crypto lawmaking: Circle exec

Sensible crypto legislation in the US remains “a live issue” but has hurdles to overcome, USDC issuer’s policy head says

article-image

Lightspring/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

Partisan bickering around CBDCs is a distraction to passing sensible crypto legislation in the US, an executive at stablecoin issuer Circle says.  

Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) discussion has evoked a “hyper-partisanship” that has even bled into presidential campaign talking points, Dante Disparte, Circle chief strategy officer and head of global policy, said during a virtual press conference Tuesday.  

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and fellow Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy have expressed opposition to a CBDC in recent months, citing concerns around privacy. 

US Rep. Tom Emmer, R-Minn., re-introduced a bill earlier this month that aims to block the Federal Reserve from directly offering a CBDC to individuals and using it to implement monetary policy.  

Ohio Congressman Warren Davidson, also a Republican, said during a Sept. 15 hearing that a wrongly-structured system of money is “perhaps the biggest existential threat to Western civilization.” Meanwhile Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., argued during the session that a government-issued digital dollar could be designed to protect privacy while streamlining payments.

Read more: Democrats call out Republican for ‘hypocritical’ anti-CBDC bill

“If you care about the role of the dollar, if you care about dollar competitiveness, then […] bright lines on which parties can innovate and use the dollar as a basic settlement currency should not be drawn,” Disparte said. “And those lines are being drawn pretty much in a partisan matter in the United States.”

Congress members Maxine Waters, D-Calif., and Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., introduced a stablecoin-focused bill last year — proposed legislation that Disparte said is “the architecture that anyone will have to pick up moving forward.”

“As goes stablecoins in some ways, so goes the rest of the digital assets agenda in the United States,” the Circle executive added.

The Senate would likely look to reconcile parts of that bill with anti-money laundering, Bank Secrecy Act and counter-terrorism financing issues in mind, Disparte noted.

Still, he added, debate and engagement around digital dollar- and broader crypto-related  regulations is keeping it “a live issue.”

Sens. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., and Kristen Gillibrand, D-N.Y., introduced a revamped Responsible Financial Innovation Act bill in July. It would create a law enforcement working group in an effort to tackle stablecoin regulation. This could include new reporting and registration requirements, among other actions.

“That’s the most credible existing piece of legislation on the Senate side that can be attached to the [McHenry-Waters] framework,” Disparte said. “But the question is, in a world where impeachments are back on the docket and a government shutdown looms, will people be able to overcome the partisan environment and do something sensible for digital assets?”

The comments come as a 2022 Bank of International Settlements survey found 93% of central banks are exploring CBDCs.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde told the EU Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee on Monday that while a digital euro pilot could be greenlit later this year, it would likely take at least two years. 

“If it can be user friendly, if it can be free, if it can be a universal digital mode of payment throughout the entire euro system, I think it will have checked many of the boxes which I believe would characterize it as success,” Lagarde noted.

Disparte told Blockworks he believes dollar digital currencies like USDC can co-exist with CBDCs — a stance expressed by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell last year. USDC’s market capitalization stood at roughly $25.6 billion on Tuesday. 

“Policymaking should ensure an even playing field, robust competition and scalability, with careful consideration of technological and operational risk, while preserving the two-tier banking and payment system,” Disparte said.


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin. Subscribe to the Forward Guidance newsletter.

Get alpha directly in your inbox with the 0xResearch newsletter — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.

The Lightspeed newsletter is all things Solana, in your inbox, every day. Subscribe to daily Solana news from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

An overview of the Base Ecosystem, with a focus on market leaders.

article-image

Although bitcoin hitting $120k by year’s end is looking unlikely

article-image

About 270 million HYPE has been claimed, valued around $7.6 billion

article-image

Stanford professors David Mazières and Dan Boneh will lead the lab alongside a cohort of graduate student researchers

article-image

With more companies holding BTC, bitcoin yielding strategies could become “a new corporate finance norm,” CoinShares posed

article-image

The proposal comes after Polygon governance considered a controversial use of bridged liquidity for yield

article-image

Can the community balance its decentralized ethos with the need for inclusivity and constructive debate?