Bitcoin ETFs surpass $4B in trade volume while BTC’s price falters 

Bitcoin ETFs are here, and, so far, bitcoin is not winning

article-image

icon0 com/Vecteezy and Adobe modified by Blockworks

share

Spot bitcoin ETFs made their public market debut in the US Thursday, raking in more than $4 billion in trading volume and sending cryptocurrency prices and related stocks all over the map. 

Bitcoin (BTC) hovered around $46,400 at the close, down about 5% from its Thursday high where it briefly topped $49,000 just after the new 11 ETFs hit the market. 

The largest cryptocurrency remains up 10% since the start of the year. 

BlackRock’s IBIT emerged as the winner in terms of day-one trading volume, surpassing $1 billion just before the close Thursday. Shares ended the day around 5% lower, at $26.63, but were trading flat in after-hours. 

Read more: Spot bitcoin ETFs surpass $1B in trade volumes after first 30 minutes

Coinbase, which serves as the custodian for 9 of the 11 new products that launched Thursday, saw its shares dip on the debut. COIN lost close to 7%, closing at $141 and putting its year-to-date returns at negative 19%. 

Business intelligence firm MicroStrategy and crypto mining company Marathon Digital also tumbled during Thursday’s session, closing 5% and 13% lower, respectively. 

Ether (ETH) emerged as an early winner in the bitcoin ETF saga, gaining as much as 8% Thursday and putting its weekly gains at 13% higher. It’s a sign, analysts say, that traders may be betting on the US Securities and Exchange Commission greenlighting ether ETFs soon, but commission comments and historical precedent do not bode well. 

Read more: Spot bitcoin ETF trading volumes surpass $2.6B

Ether futures ETFs hit the market in October 2023, two years after bitcoin futures products were cleared by the SEC. The securities regulator already has received spot ether ETF filings and could issue responses as early as May, but commissioners are likely to extend the review period. 

SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s Wednesday statement makes it clear that while he did vote in favor of the approval, he is in no way supportive of cryptocurrencies as a whole. 

“Though we’re merit neutral, I’d note that the underlying assets in the metals ETPs have consumer and industrial uses, while in contrast bitcoin is primarily a speculative, volatile asset that’s also used for illicit activity including ransomware, money laundering, sanction evasion, and terrorist financing,” Gensler wrote


Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross. Subscribe to the Empire newsletter.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Research report HL cover.jpg

Research

It's increasingly apparent that orderbooks represent the most efficient model for perpetual trading, with the primary obstacle being that the most popular blockchains are ill-suited for hosting a fully onchain orderbook. Hyperliquid is a perpetual trading protocol built on its own L1 that aims to replicate the user experience of centralized exchanges while offering a fully onchain orderbook.

article-image

Higher trading volumes and stablecoin revenue are set to drive sizeable quarter-over-quarter improvements, analysts say

article-image

Bitcoin and ether lost around 3% and 5% over 24-hours, respectively, erasing Monday’s gains, after the first day of spot ETF trading in Hong Kong left much to be desired

article-image

There’s some truth to the EIGEN concerns popping up on Crypto Twitter

article-image

Despite ordinal volume dipping following the Bitcoin halving due to high network fees, the latest Motoko Sentinel collection saw an increase in its trading volume

article-image

The 43-page white paper explained the new token, with claims set to start on May 10

article-image

Not everyone with “cryptographer” in their title has the training or expertise to write cryptographic code that’s used by real people to protect real things