Rollups Aren’t All That Decentralized. Does Anybody Care?

A slick user experience tends to trump principles of decentralization

article-image

Hong Vo/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

They say the average web user spends about six seconds reading written content on a webpage before moving on. Load times, optimal design and, of course, interesting stories are crucial for keeping eyes stuck to any given page.

We are an impatient lot, accustomed to instant access to information.

Before you leave, consider the average blockchain dapp. That’s an application operating on top of an ostensibly decentralized network, like Ethereum, for example. 

For users to consider a network truly decentralized, it a) should be composed of a collective of disparate participants and b) must have no central agents who could otherwise control or censor things in a way that is detrimental to users.

If you’ve ever dabbled in the average dapp experience, it might remind you of the old 56k modem days — whoops, I probably lost a few readers with that comparison — the transaction times and user experience can be painfully slow and unresponsive, especially now that we’ve been spoiled by near-instant internet performance.

Remember waiting for a JPEG to slowly fill the screen line by line back in the late 90s? You probably do since I already lost the ones who don’t. Now, you can capture that nostalgic feeling with a similarly plodding experience using NFT and DeFi dapps!

The key difference being, a dapp ideally operates on a decentralized network, free from censorship and centralized influence. But do you care? Does anybody care?

Users prefer a slick experience

A lot of users don’t seem to care all that much, says Josh Bowen, CEO of Astria, who spoke to Blockworks on the Empire podcast along with the CEO of Espresso, Ben Fisch. Sadly, it seems that a slick user experience tends to trump the principles of decentralization.

“It’s a user demand question,” Bowen says, “Fundamentally, users prefer faster block times.”

“Maybe it’s somewhat cynical,” Bowen says, “but users, I believe, will trend towards something that provides a higher quality user experience” regardless of principle.

Users will naturally prefer consuming two seconds rather than twenty to complete a transaction, unaware of the trade-offs that enable the speedier option. “It’s one of these general difficult things of cryptography and security,” he says, “you become aware of them when they fail catastrophically.” 

“Prior to that, everyone just assumes everything is going smoothly.”

By the time users realize they’ve accepted these trade-offs, it’s too late to do anything to fix it, Bowen says.

One trendy way to somewhat safely speed things up in a decentralized network is to use rollups. These are specialized blockchains that carry out tasks to alleviate the load on the main network. However, there is one aspect of rollup solutions that is centralized, and that is the sequencer responsible for organizing transactions. This is primarily done for the sake of performance.

Rollups like Optimism and Arbitrum operate their own sequencers, giving them a significant degree of direct influence over transaction ordering — a role that Bowen says should also be decentralized instead of operating under the sole control of any rollup provider. 

Does it really matter?

A word of warning: You’re going to see the terms ‘centralization’ and ‘decentralization’ an awful lot here but please, hang in there. You’ve made it this far.

It’s all a balancing act, Bowen says, “The job fundamentally is providing users with a good enough experience without requiring them to sacrifice the decentralization principles to get that better user experience,” he says. 

If the only option available for a high quality experience is centralized, a good percent of users will choose it, he says. “So I think it’s important to provide them an option that is still decentralized while providing that good user experience.”

“I take a pretty cynical perspective in that, generally I assume users just, quite frankly, don’t give a damn about decentralization.”

Bowen feels that as the industry has progressed, people have become less motivated by the founding principles of blockchain technology. More often, speculative aspirations, the desire for speedy transactions and clout-chasing behaviors have prioritized ease-of-use and performance over the preservation of any fundamental values. He says it is up to builders in the space to “reinforce those primitives and provide good user experiences.”

Fisch argues that users do care about the benefits of decentralization, just not necessarily the principle itself. “If one of the founders of Arbitrum or Optimism shows up on TV in handcuffs and goes to jail… then yeah, I think everyone’s going to decentralize their sequencers really, really quickly.”

Ideally, he hopes it doesn’t have to come to such an event, instead moving toward “the ideals of the industry” without being threatened by external governing agencies.

Fisch adds that one advantage of decentralization that users already care about, whether they know it or not, is the composability enabled through the technology. “Users like the fact that all apps on Ethereum are composable with all other apps — and that comes from the fact that Ethereum is a decentralized system.”

“They’re all sharing the same system. They’re all interoperable.”

Perhaps decentralization wouldn’t be necessary, Fisch suggests, “if blockchains were all perfectly competitive with each other.” 

Which brings things back to the core issue, he says: “Internet services are prone naturally to centralization due to network effects.”

“So you do have to decentralize the operation of the internet service if you want to have long-term resilience.”

Speaking of long-term resilience… you stuck around for this whole story? 

Consider yourself above average. You just might be patient enough for a truly decentralized network experience.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

  • Blockworks Daily: The newsletter that helps thousands of investors understand crypto and the markets, by Byron Gilliam.
  • Empire: Start your morning with the top news and analysis to inform your day in crypto.
  • Forward Guidance: Reporting and analysis on the growing intersection of crypto and macroeconomics, policy and finance.
  • 0xResearch: Alpha directly in your inbox. Market highlights, data, degen trade ideas, governance updates, token performance and more.
  • Lightspeed: Built for Solana investors, developers and community members. The latest from one of crypto’s hottest networks.
  • The Drop: For crypto collectors and traders, covering apps, games, memes and more.
Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Industry City | Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Unlocked by Template Presentation.jpg

Research

The Solana validator landscape has changed drastically over the past year. The chain now has 1,332 active validators with 380.9 million SOL staked (63.9% of supply) as of February 2025. Validator revenue had diversified beyond inflationary rewards (still making up 55%) to include Jito tips (30%), priority fees (24%), and base fees (<1%), in January, especially with the increased activity on Solana. Since then, issuance has become dominant again (76%), while Jito tips (14%), priority fees (9%), and base fees (less than 1%) have reduced in share of February 2025. There has been a strong shift towards non-inflationary revenue sources, which have become more central to validator economics as priority fees and off-chain blockspace auctions gain traction. Client diversity has also improved drastically, with implementations such as Agave, Jito-Solana, and Frankendancer already in use, and upcoming clients like Firedancer and Sig expected to further strengthen resilience and reduce reliance on a single codebase.

article-image

BWR analyst Carlos Gonzalez Campo explains the consequences of SOL inflation and transfers lost to “leaky buckets”

article-image

Empire co-host Santiago Santos makes the case that memecoins have actually helped push infra forward…just not in the way you think

article-image

A16z Crypto lists seven buckets for tokens and recommendations for how to regulate them, in a filing submitted to the SEC

article-image

New model aims to resolve trading inefficiencies with a single execution layer and market maker changes

article-image

Investors navigating BTC face short-term unpredictability, influence from other markets

article-image

The GENIUS Act aims to establish regulatory guidelines for stablecoins