Security Threat Exposed for Browser-based Crypto Wallets

MetaMask, Phantom, Brave and other browser-based crypto wallets say no known user funds have been affected

article-image

Blockworks exclusive art by axel Rangel

share
  • The discovered vulnerability exposes browser wallet users’ secret recovery phrases
  • Affected wallet providers were contacted, and the vulnerability was kept confidential until the security issues were remediated

A number of popular browser-based crypto wallets are vulnerable to hacking under certain conditions, according to new research. 

Blockchain security firm Halborn found several instances where wallets including Brave, MetaMask and Phantom can be compromised under specific computer conditions — adding yet another wrinkle to traders still reeling from recent high-profile decentralized finance (DeFi) hacks. 

The conditions can expose a crypto wallet user’s secret recovery phrase (a series of words generated that gives the owner access to their crypto), which can then be used to change their private key. All told, billions of dollars of digital assets are stored in software wallets. 

Affected wallet providers were contacted and the vulnerability was kept under wraps until the security issues were remediated.

Who is affected? 

Users who meet the following conditions may be at risk:

  • Users who have unencrypted hard drives
  • Users who have previously imported their secret recovery phrase into a web extension on a device that is in the possession of someone else or have had their computer compromised
  • Users who have used the “show secret recovery phrase” checkbox to view their secret recovery phrase on-screen during the import process

Cryptocurrency wallets like the ones impacted by this vulnerability, such as Metamask, are a self-custody wallet — meaning users alone are responsible for safeguarding their private keys. 

“Exchanges like Coinbase or Binance usually hold custody of those keys on the behalf of their customers,” Steven Walbroehl, Halborn’s chief security officer and co-founder, told Blockworks.

“This impact is only for those that self-custody those assets, and it is the users’ responsibility to take it seriously, upgrade the wallets to the patched version listed on the wallet developer’s websites, and to rotate their mnemonic phrase if they think it may be at risk,” Walbroehl said. 

MetaMask has asked users to update their extension versions to 10.11.3 and later and to “take the time to enable full disk encryption on computers.”

Echoing Walbroehl, Dan Finlay, founder and group manager at MetaMask wrote in a blog post that users should “remember that it’s your responsibility to keep your computer secure. No wallet or software can keep itself safe if the system it runs on is compromised. Take time to learn how to avoid installing a virus on your computer.” 

Phantom, meanwhile, wrote in a blog post that to protect themselves on Web3, on top of general internet safety measures, users should diversify their wallets to minimize risk and use hardware wallets to store large amounts of assets and currencies.

“Other mitigations include storing the mnemonic phrase/key on a hardware-based wallet like Trezor or Ledger. These wallets still work with software wallets like Metamask when physically connected via a USB cable…but it protects the keys from attackers that may access your disk,” Walbroehl said.

Halborn has been rewarded $50,000. The wallet providers did not immediately return requests for comment.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 24 - 26, 2026

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research Report Templates (27).png

Research

Solana's spot trading landscape will remain bifurcated: prop AMMs will own the short-tail of highly liquid pairs, while passive AMMs continue drifting toward the long-tail. Both can win via vertical integration, but in opposite directions: passive AMMs are moving closer to users through token issuance platforms (e.g., Pump-PumpSwap, MetaDAO-Futarchy AMM), while prop AMMs are moving down the stack into transaction landing services and infrastructure (e.g., HumidiFi-Nozomi). The venues most at risk are legacy AMMs with limited end-user control and no durable, launch-driven source of order flow.

article-image

BTC finished the week up 1.6%, while L2s, RWAs and the treasury trade continued to grind lower

article-image

DTCC moves DTC-custodied Treasuries onchain via Canton, while Lighter’s LIT launches trading at a fees multiple in Hyperliquid territory

article-image

In the 90s, rapt audiences worldwide watched a coffee pot — will that fascination ever turn to crypto?

article-image

Some systems improve by failing — and crypto has no choice

article-image

Yield Basis introduces an IL-free AMM design that already dominates BTC DEX liquidity

article-image

Maybe tokenholders don’t need the rights that corporate shareholders have come to expect

Newsletter

The Breakdown

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Blockworks Research

Unlock crypto's most powerful research platform.

Our research packs a punch and gives you actionable takeaways for each topic.

SubscribeGet in touch

Blockworks Inc.

133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Blockworks Network

NewsPodcastsNewslettersEventsRoundtablesAnalytics