SBF book ‘Going Infinite’ is a ‘glaringly incorrect representation of the facts’

Framework Ventures’ Anderson says author Michael Lewis knows how to sell books, but doesn’t understand the culture he’s writing about

article-image

Melnikov Dmitriy/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

The Michael Lewis book “Going Infinite” centers on the rise and fall of Sam Bankman-Fried and the failed FTX crypto exchange. It has been panned for its fawning portrayal of a “cute and quirky” genius who was just misunderstood, while presenting a deeply biased account of events. 

Framework Ventures co-founder Michael Anderson adds to the criticism, arguing that the author’s skewed version of reality just doesn’t seem to add up.

On the Bell Curve podcast (Spotify/Apple), Anderson says the book contains elements that create a “glaringly incorrect representation of the facts.” For one, he says that the author describes the failure of the FTX exchange as a “bank run.” 

“There can only be a bank run if you have under-collateralization in a system, because you don’t have all the money available to be able to pay people back,” he explains. “It was pretty clear that there was rotation from assets that they didn’t like into assets that they did like,” he says.

An exchange should consistently have sufficient value to back up all deposits, Anderson explains, “especially if you have a highly profitable business.”

“That’s how exchanges work,” he says. “That’s not how banks work.”

To protect against a bank run, banks must hold certain quantities of cash and Treasurys to ensure liquidity and to be able to backstop loans and balance sheets, Anderson explains. “That’s the business model of a bank,” he says. “A bank run is not possible with a one to one backed exchange, period. End of story.”

Read more from our opinion section: New Sam Bankman-Fried book ‘Going Infinite’ goes absolutely nowhere

Almost too perfectly incorrect

Another inaccuracy that the book suggests, Framework Ventures co-founder Vance Spencer adds, is the notion that the exchange was profitable prior to the meltdown. 

“People only wanted to trade on FTX because you could trade against Alameda,” he explains. According to Spencer, FTX users were able to trade “shitcoin perps they launched and then subsequently destroyed. They were the initial liquidity providers for that.”

Spencer describes initial exchange offerings that caused major losses for the company. “They bought all of those tokens and then proceeded to seed the perp and trade against people — and that was why you traded there.”

“You could trade against Alameda,” he continues, “and Alameda was so bad at trading that they had to steal customer deposits to backfill the shortages.”

“Like, ipso facto, this was not a profitable business. It was just margin that was being internalized and then lost by Alameda.”

“I think, you know, he’s just frankly gotten this one completely wrong,” Spencer says.

“He may understand how to sell books,” Anderson says, “but I don’t think he understands the culture around the things that he’s writing about.”

What struck Ippolito about the book’s inaccuracies is not that the writer “got it a little bit wrong,” he says, but that “he got it a hundred percent, 180 degrees wrong.”

Ippolito explains that the book describes FTX as a sort of “profitable casino” that ultimately failed because of Alameda’s shortcomings. FTX “was never real,” Ippolito says, “but Alameda was the vehicle that he was using to siphon all of the wealth out of FTX.”

Read more: Co-founder Wang says FTX code allowed Alameda’s ‘unlimited withdrawals’

“It’s just so incorrect,” he says. “It’s almost too perfectly incorrect, if that makes sense.”

Spencer wonders, “who knows what Michael Lewis was fed, where his primary sources of information were, how much SBF was just bullshitting and making up as he went along?”

“I don’t know. I just think it’s so sad.”


Don’t miss the next big story – join our free daily newsletter.

Tags

Upcoming Events

Hilton Metropole | 225 Edgware Rd, London

Mon - Wed, March 18 - 20, 2024

Crypto’s premier institutional conference returns to London in March 2024. The DAS: London Experience: Attend expert-led panel discussions and fireside chats Hear the latest developments regarding the crypto and digital asset regulatory environment directly from policymakers and experts.

Salt Lake City, UT

WED - FRI, OCTOBER 9 - 11, 2024

Pack your bags, anon — we’re heading west! Join us in the beautiful Salt Lake City for the third installment of Permissionless. Come for the alpha, stay for the fresh air. Permissionless III promises unforgettable panels, killer networking opportunities, and mountains […]

recent research

Top Icon.png

Research

Osmosis thrived in H2 2023 on the back of increased DeFi activity deriving from recently launched Cosmos-related projects and better market conditions. With new value accrual mechanisms for the native token, Osmosis is well-positioned to continue its strong performance in 2024.

/

article-image

Though the opposing flow trend is likely to slow over time, industry watchers note, bitcoin fund assets could one day eclipse the $90 billion gold ETF space

article-image

Celestia had the first mover advantage. EigenDA has staked ether. What sets Avail apart?

article-image

Bitcoin moved 1% higher Monday morning in New York, Matrixport analysts say $62,000 could happen next month

article-image

It’s hard to believe right now that crypto — even with all of its flexibility and massive capabilities — could ever be like cash on the internet

article-image

Michael Saylor announced Monday morning that MicroStrategy bought 3k more bitcoin after the X account was compromised over the weekend

article-image

Plus, Pudgy Penguins grows its brand and a group of Autoglyphs sell for $14.5 million